Login

View change log entry

Back

Navigation:  ◀ 63420  63422 ▶ 

Change log entry 63421
Processed by: richwarm (2017-04-03 10:49:39 GMT)
Comment: << review queue entry 59985 - submitted by 'ghast' >>
I can't find any good evidence for "倒藪" on search engines, whereas "盜藪" (absent in CC-CEDICT) has definitions in several dicts, e.g. moedict and baidu, and besides 盜藪 seems more intuitive (盜=bandit, 倒=??, could 倒藪 be a typo for 盜藪?) . Perhaps 倒藪 exists and is correct, but having 倒藪 and not having 盜藪 is a bit suspect anyway.

For instance, 盜藪 is defined as "強盜賊匪聚集的地方。" in moedict ( https://www.moedict.tw/%E7%9B%9C%E8%97%AA )
But there is no 倒藪 at moedict.

Where did 倒藪 come from? Does this term really exist?
---------------------------

Editor: 盗薮 is in Pleco's PLC, which means it's quite likely to have appeared in some edition or other of ACE ("A Chinese-English Dictionary", first published in 1978). The definition in Pleco/ACE(?) is "bandits' (or robbers') den". This entry, like many others in ACE, was almost certainly copied by ABC (the wording of the definition is almost identical to ACE's) except that they wrote the first character 盜 incorrectly as 倒. So ABC has
倒藪[-薮] dàosǒu n. 〈wr.〉 bandits'/robbers' den
That incorrect ABC entry was then copied by a former CC-CEDICT editor into CC-CEDICT.
Thanks for spotting the error.
Diff:
- 倒藪 倒薮 [dao4 sou3] /bandits' den/
+ 盜藪 盗薮 [dao4 sou3] /bandits' den/
By MDBG 2024
Privacy and cookies
Help wanted: the CC-CEDICT project is looking for new volunteer editors!