Login

View change log entry

Navigation:  ◀ 96153  96155 ▶ 

Change log entry 96154
Processed by: kbaiko (2026-07-03 13:22:15 UTC)
Comment: << review queue entry 87939 - submitted by 'richwarm' >>
v2

I don't think it should be defined as an adjective ("conspicuous" etc).

Or maybe delete the entry as a transparent 引人... construction?

Other 引人... expressions:
引人深思的是...
在野台營造出熱烈氣氛,引人駐足。
其中以開喜烏龍茶的「新新人類」系列最引人矚目,「新新人類」也因此廣被泛用。
最引人省思的是,
引人發噱

(引人注目, on the other hand is perhaps considered lexicalized. It's in GF, LA, M etc.)

Or we could keep the entry on the basis that CEDICT intentionally includes some transparent constructions because we provide relatively few example phrases within definitions.
Diff:
- 引人注意 引人注意 [yin3 ren2 zhu4 yi4] /to attract attention/eye-catching/conspicuous/
+ 引人注意 引人注意 [[yin3 ren2 zhu4yi4]] /to attract attention/
By MDBG 2026
Privacy and cookies
Help wanted: the CC-CEDICT project is looking for new volunteer editors!