| Change log entry 82654 | |
|---|---|
| Processed by: | richwarm (2024-04-01 04:29:36 UTC) |
| Comment: |
<< review queue entry 75247 - submitted by 'encn' >> try v2 format why is it necessary to add braces { } to the headwords? it's easy to parse the mixed version (v1+v2) of CC-CEDICT with one script. ----------------------------- Editor: I'm not sure that it's necessary. Maybe braces are redundant like the slashes at the start and the end of a definition. At any rate, the Editor website was modified a few months ago so that braces are not required for the likes of OK繃. I believe braces *can* still be used, though. Braces need not be displayed by apps, of course, just as slashes and square brackets are not necessarily displayed. For example, 多糖 [[duo1tang2]] /polysaccharide/ can be displayed as 多糖 (duōtáng) polysaccharide |
| Diff: |
- OK繃 OK绷 [O K beng1] /band-aid (Tw)/ # + {OK}繃 {OK}绷 [[{OK}-beng1]] /(Tw) band-aid; sticking plaster/ + OK繃 OK绷 [[OK-beng1]] /(Tw) band-aid; sticking plaster/ |