| Change log entry 79449 | |
|---|---|
| Processed by: | richwarm (2023-09-15 04:38:54 UTC) |
| Comment: |
<< review queue entry 72314 >> neologism c. 2013 时间有问题 用百度搜索“逆袭”，时间设定为 2010 年，有很多结果。往前推，08年、09年也有少量结果。 196天成功上岸985高校,10年职场人是如何逆袭的? - 哔哩哔哩 2010年8月10日 2010年11月19日 - 《宋开心的爱情逆袭》 脑瘫男孩独立创业,逆袭富豪老板,炒股从来没赔过丨说出你的故事... 视频时长 01:33 2010年11月20日 征服怒海 学渣逆袭成学霸!竟是因这里的女老师太美,果然是爱情...视频时长 02:25 2008年9月12日 逆袭 ぎゃくしゅう 曾用于 1955年电影《ゴジラの逆袭》 ----------------------------------- Editor: Keep in mind 1) in cc-cedict, "neologism c. ...." does not mean that the word or meaning originated in that year. Rather, it means that the coinage dates from *no later than* that year. It also means that we found usage in that year. "c." means "circa" (approximately). We are trying to give an *approximate* date for when the word started to be used. And the date is meant to be taken as an *upper bound*, not necessarily the actual year the word was coined. 2) if you label a word a "neologism", one assumes it was coined in the last few years. But if it was coined in, say 2008, then 20 years from now (in 2043), it's no longer a newly coined word. But it will still true to say that it was *in 2008* a neologism, which is what "neologism c. 2008" means. In other words, the simple label "neologism" ages poorly, whereas "neologism c. ...." remains true forever. |
| Diff: |
- 逆襲 逆袭 [ni4 xi2] /to counterattack; to strike back/(neologism c. 2013) (of an underdog) to go on the offensive; to make an improbable comeback/ # + 逆襲 逆袭 [ni4 xi2] /to counterattack; to strike back/(neologism) (of an underdog) to go on the offensive; to make an improbable comeback/ + 逆襲 逆袭 [ni4 xi2] /to counterattack; to strike back/(neologism c. 2008) (of an underdog) to go on the offensive; to make an improbable comeback/ |