| Change log entry 68733 | |
|---|---|
| Processed by: | goldyn_chyld (2019-12-15 10:18:35 UTC) |
| Comment: |
<< review queue entry 65467 - submitted by 'richwarm' >> 1) NC LA K GF 2) Despite the previous editor's assertion, it's *performance* (性能), not *quality*. e.g. LA says 性價比=性能/價格 3) Even though it's called "cost-performance", the formula (for both 性价比 and cost-performance ratio) is (performance) / (cost), not (cost) / (performance). (Ref: LA, Wp) Wp ~ "Price-performance is often written as cost-performance ... Even though this term would seem to be a straightforward ratio, when price performance is improved, it actually refers to the performance divided by the price." |
| Diff: |
- 性價比 性价比 [xing4 jia4 bi3] /quality-price ratio/ + 性價比 性价比 [xing4 jia4 bi3] /cost-performance ratio/ |