Login

View change log entry

Navigation:  ◀ 67492  67494 ▶ 

Change log entry 67493
Processed by: goldyn_chyld (2019-06-11 13:11:19 UTC)
Comment: << review queue entry 64028 - submitted by 'richwarm' >>
"One of the chief complaints against China is that it relies on what US authorities call “forced technology transfer”: foreign companies seeking access to the Chinese market are required to share their intellectual property with a domestic “partner.” But the word “forced” suggests a degree of coercion that does not make economic sense. American and European companies do not have to invest in China; if they choose to do so, knowing that it will require them to share their technology, it is because they still expect to earn a profit."
https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/myth-of-forced-technology-transfer-china-by-daniel-gros-2018-11

确实,“市场换技术”是中国自改革开放以来在中央层面所推行的一项政策,它是中国按照其大国的比较优势所制定的一项普普通通的产业政策。按照这一政策原则,中国在引进外资时通常会以合同的形式要求外资企业在进入中国市场一段时期后,向中国的合资企业转让技术。毫无疑问,“以市场换技术”这样一项政策有力地推动了中国的技术进步。
https://new.qq.com/omn/20180701/20180701A1CAKN.html

BB @ 市场换技术 ~
https://baike.baidu.com/item/%E5%B8%82%E5%9C%BA%E6%8D%A2%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF
Diff:
+ 市場換技術 市场换技术 [shi4 chang3 huan4 ji4 shu4] /market access in return for technology transfer (PRC policy since the 1980s which gives foreign companies access to China's domestic market in exchange for sharing their intellectual property, characterized by the US in the 2019 trade war as "forced technology transfer")/
By MDBG 2025
Privacy and cookies
Help wanted: the CC-CEDICT project is looking for new volunteer editors!