Change log entry 59630 | |
---|---|
Processed by: | richwarm (2015-12-14 23:04:10 UTC) |
Comment: |
<< review queue entry 57000 - submitted by 'vermillon' >> I just want to ask: could 疏于 deserve an entry? Sorry if this is a stupid question. -------------------------------- Editor: 疏于 does mean "negligent" - 疏於檢討產業結構調整 failed to play its proper coordinating role - 疏於防範 negligent about preventive measures But it can also mean "lacking" - 在長久隔離下,基因疏於交流,due to long periods of isolation without genetic exchange - 所以身為第一線的內科醫師往往疏於辨識厭食症患者,GPs at the front line of the health care system generally lack the ability to recognize anorexics, - 「而且越來越會唸書,拚碩士、考證照,但是根本的廚藝卻越來越疏於練習,和一般普通高中的區隔越來越少,」 |
Diff: |
# - 疏 疏 [shu1] /to dredge/to clear away obstruction/thin/sparse/scanty/distant (relation)/not close/to neglect/negligent/to present a memorial to the Emperor/commentary/annotation/ # + 疏 疏 [shu1] /to dredge/to clear away obstruction/thin/sparse/scanty/distant (relation)/not close/to neglect/negligent/to present a memorial to the Emperor/commentary/annotation/ + 疏於 疏于 [shu1 yu2] /to fail to pay sufficient attention to/to be negligent in regard to/to be lacking in/ |