Change log entry 43249 | |
---|---|
Processed by: | richwarm (2012-08-24 12:05:33 UTC) |
Comment: |
<< review queue entry 42174 - submitted by 'xiaoxiong' >> 閒談 is correct, 閑談 doesn't appear in any dictionary, but is very common as well, so why not include it as well maybe we should check all the 閒/閑 entries, there's gotta be more mistakes Editor: 1) 闲谈 is a *verb*, and the noun sense follows from that (whereas a noun sense doesn't imply that there is a verb sense.) 2) "idle talk; empty gossip" makes it sound quite pejorative, and it doesn't necessarily have that tone at all ~ 閒談間,左元淮跟鄭福田聊到自己在美國的研究工作 As they chatted, Tsuo described his research work in the States. 成員以丁福保、吳稚暉、錢化佛、莊蘊寬、蔣維喬、裘葆良為主,呼引志同道合的名士前來閒談,大家無拘無束,有情有趣。 Core members Ting Fu-pao, Wu Chih-hui, Chien Hua-fo, Chuang Yun-kuan, Chiang Wei-chiao, and Chiu Pao-liang brought in kindred spirits to take part in the unrestrained, stimulating discussions. 3) "why not include it as well?" It's *already* in CEDICT! But in fact, I propose to *delete* it (in a separate submission), because it's not necessary to include 閑談 闲谈 [xian2 tan2] /variant of 閒談|闲谈[xian2 tan2]/ since, at the single-hanzi level, 閑 and 閒 are noted as variants in CEDICT. It's the same with all of the many other pairs of variants, one using 閑 and the other using 閒 (like 閒談 and 閑談). E.g. There are 1a 閑漢 2a 閑暇 3a 閑書 4a 閑耍 and there are also 1b 閒漢 2b 閒暇 3b 閒書 4b 閒耍 I suggest we should only have the 閒 words (1b, 2b etc) in CEDICT and leave it to software tools to display these entries when someone searches for 閑漢, 閑暇 etc. - Wenlin displays entries for only 1a, 2a, 3a, 4a (There are *no* entries for compounds containing 閒!) - "Far East" has all eight words, but also many other words where only the 閒 form is given, and it is understood (from the entry for 閑) that 閑 may be substituted for 閒 in these compounds. - Currently, CEDICT has (2a and 2b), but has (3b and no 3a). I intend to put in a comprehensive submission on 閑 and 閒 entries in the near future. 4) "maybe we should check all the 閒/閑 entries, there's gotta be more mistakes" Any time you check a cross-section of CEDICT entries (such as "all entries containing **") you will find mistakes that need to be fixed. But I don't know what mistake is supposed to be identified in this submission. |
Diff: |
- 閒談 闲谈 [xian2 tan2] /chat/ # + 閒談 闲谈 [xian2 tan2] /idle talk/empty gossip/ + 閒談 闲谈 [xian2 tan2] /to chat/ - 閑談 闲谈 [xian2 tan2] /idle talk/empty gossip/ + 閑談 闲谈 [xian2 tan2] /variant of 閒談|闲谈[xian2 tan2]/ |